Skip to content
Counseling Session

Feedback Informed Care

Collaborating with patients to improve mental health care services

Kaiser Permanente uses a collaborative model of care to deliver mental health and addiction care services.

This measurement-based approach, called feedback informed care (FIC), places the patient voice at the center of decision-making and treatment choices.

Don Mordecai, MD QuoteProviders use patient-reported information to track their progress and understand their response to different treatments, supported by a computer-based outcome management system.

When clinicians are properly trained in this method and patients regularly provide feedback, this approach improves mental health outcomes.

How it works:

At each visit, patients fill out the FIC questionnaire, which includes a depression screening tool known as the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9).

Patients are also asked questions about anxiety levels and productive functioning, in addition to three questions related to the patients’ treatment experience.

Core elements of Feedback Informed Care for Mental Health

These “goodness of fit” questions ask whether patients feel their therapy is focused on what is most important to them (treatment goals), whether they agree with the approach to their care (treatment method), and whether they feel understood and respected by their clinician (therapeutic bond).

The computer-based outcome management system then tallies the responses to create a distress score for each patient.

Figure 1: Sample patient dashboard created by an outcomes management system. This shows the patients’ current behavioral scores and treatment progress over time.The higher the score, the more pronounced the patient’s symptoms, and the greater the feeling of distress.

These scores can be displayed on a patient dashboard, allowing the patient and provider to better understand progress over time (Figure 1 above).

This information also allows the therapist and patient to identify changes that might improve their therapeutic relationship and assess whether to continue a current therapy or change treatment.

Over time, they can assess how the patient responded to those changes.

Where Feedback Informed Care began

Kaiser Permanente’s implementation of FIC first began in California and is now part of care across all our regions.

During the initial implementation, patients in therapy for mental health conditions completed 85% of questionnaires during their visits, resulting in 50,000 completed questionnaires per month.

Providers in every Northern California department of mental health participated, and over 1,500 clinicians received intensive FIC training.

Clinicians led weekly case consultation groups to deepen the level of FIC expertise among therapists in their departments.

From 2022-23, patients completed over 256,000 assessments in specialty mental health.

How we’ve evolved

The COVID-19 pandemic reshaped how we provide mental health and addiction care and increased virtual care options. Initially, pandemic-related shifts in care delivery impacted workflows and data collection rates, impacting providers’ ability to engage patients in FIC.

While workflows were originally tailored for an in-person experience, we now provide the questionnaire to patients electronically prior to their visit.

Despite these challenges, our experience and independent studies show FIC remains a promising approach that can lead to improved patient results.

“I use Feedback Informed Care extensively and I’ve found it to be very helpful. I can use real-time data to track a patient’s progress over 4-6 sessions. If I don’t see any improvements then I know something is wrong and needs my attention.” Julia Gallichio, LCSW at Kaiser PermanenteKaiser Permanente physicians and therapists believe that FIC can be part of an effective strategy that elevates the patient’s voice and increases engagement in the care process.

Kaiser Permanente plans to continue using the FIC approach to support patients with addiction services and help those living with mental health conditions.

One study of this approach examined changes in depression and showed that PHQ-9 scores can be significantly decreased (from 13.42 to 8.75) in roughly 12 sessions, using FIC.

The same was true for patients who took the questionnaire measuring generalized anxiety disorder, known as the GAD-7. GAD-7 scores in patients decreased from 11.08 to 7.70, when comparing baseline scores from the first to last session.

The result of this study indicates that FIC is a promising approach that gives patients and providers a new lens to assess treatment progress and facilitate meaningful dialogue leading to improved results for patients.

In addition, as more patients participate in FIC, their collective data will help Kaiser Permanente refine best practices in therapeutic approaches.

As providers continue using the FIC model to communicate with their patients and enhance our workflows across markets, along with collecting outcomes data to improve the impact of this approach.

Back To Top